I know a lot of people are suspicious about Barrack Obama's selection of Rick Warren to pray the "inaugural prayer," and the fears are broadly two-fold.
First, (and this causes me consternation), is Obama seeking to fortify his standing in the evangelical world by simply selecting an evangelical to pray at his inauguration ceremony? Evangelicals have been, in large part, coopted by the Republican party in recent decades to the point that the Republican platform has become synonymous with Evangelical Christianity in the minds of many. This has given rise to a lack of critical engagement with and discussion of all sorts of issues by conservative Christians.
1. Many blindly support any war effort taken up by America without giving thought to the innocent blood that will be inevitably spilt and the fact that this is one of the things that provoked the wrath of God.
2. Few give thought to our command to be stewards of the environment. Many see red anytime a green environmental protection measure is introduced by Congress, curiously equating protection of God's creation with liberal hippy political positions, rather than with the biblical mandate to subdue (read: not rape, pillage, destroy) the created order.
3. A genuine lack of compassion for the homeless, single mother, and unemployed in this country is palpable within evangelical circles. The prevailing mindset within evangelicalism towards these citizens is (until very recently, and it is still the mindset of the majority, I think), that 1) the homeless can and should get a job and an apartment 2) the single mother is entirely to blame for her single-motherhoodness and so she must simply deal with it and 3) the unemployed, like the single mother, are at fault and therefore should suffer for their inability to be employed. A gross ignorance of the facts of homelessness, single motherhood, and unemployment is exhibited in the mindset of many evangelical Christians. Sure, there are exceptions: the homeless drug addict who would rather get a fix than a job, the woman who refuses to marry and sleeps around, collecting welfare checks simply because "she can," and the lazy or intentionally unemployable guy who watches cartoons every weekday rather than scouring the wanted ads in the paper.
Wow, that turned out to be longer than I intended. Suffice to say, we are not as compassionate towards the disadvantaged as Scripture urges (commands?) us to be. My fear with Obama's selection of Warren is that he is seeking to attempt the same coopting of the evangelical world, baptizing his policies by including evangelical pastors in the inaugural proceedings. I think he knows that there is enough ignorance out there that some people will respond with this horrid reasoning: "Obama can't be that bad- look who he asked to pray at his inauguration!" May we not be so naive!
The second fear within evangelicalism with respect to Obama's selection of Warren is that Warren is abandoning the evangelical faith, capitulating to a society and president whose publically stated policy positions are at odds with the Bible.
Here is a story that might at least give you a bit of encouragement regarding where Rick Warren stands, and hopefully this article will encourage you to pray for this man, as he is sure to receive vitriolic and hateful backlash from the secular media for the content of his prayer today.
Update: I want to clarify that I don't believe that
all of Obama's policies are at odds with the Bible. Some certainly are, but as Christians we must be very careful to think biblically before we think politically as we evaluate public policy decisions.